Friday, November 6, 2009

Sach an Innings!



Time and again it has been said that Sachin Tendulkar plays for records. Time and again it has been said that Sachin Tendulkar chokes when India has to chase a target of more than 250. And time and again Sachin Tendulkar replies to all his critics in his own style, by letting his bat talk.

5th November 2009 was no different when India had to chase a target of 351 and many, including Ponting thought that it would not be possible. This match reminded us of many other matches. The very score of 350 reminded me of the 2003 World Cup finals when Australia scored 359. A terrific start by Sehwag reminded me of two matches: one against Pakistan in the same World Cup and the Natwest Series finals in July 2002 in which India successfully chased 325.

And when Sachin took command, his Sharjah centuries of 1998, the CB Series finals last year and most of his marvelous innings came to my mind again because he was simply at his ‘best’. He started slow no doubt which showed that he did not want to lose his wicket at any cost. Slow and steady, when he reached the score of seven, the nearly 40,000 people present were on their feet cheering his 17,000th run not knowing that was just the tip of the iceberg.

The part of his innings which amazed me the most was his strike rate which got better even though he was running out of partners. When the pressure was mounting, he got a better grasp of the match by hitting consecutive sixes off Hauritz which were from the meat of the bat. And his earlier six off Shane Watson was an identical twin of the six he smacked in the 2003 World Cup off Andrew Caddick.

His innings was tailor made to take his country to victory. Hitting the boundaries at the right time, converting the ones into twos and the twos into threes, rotating the strike, and of course, preserving his wicket almost till the end.

But time and again it has happened that Sachin scores a big chunk of the total and still India loses. Everybody remembers the 1999 Chennai Test against Pakistan in which after he scored 136 of the required 271, the last three batsmen could not score the remaining 17 runs. Why blame the last three for losing? Couldn’t the frontline batsmen stick around for a little more time? And again, this time against Australia, he scored half the runs while most of the others went back to the pavilion in a hurry as if they had been holding their pee since birth.

With that mammoth score of 175 while chasing, I believe he surely scored one of his best centuries. No doubt, he wanted India to win more than anything else whether it was 175 or a 200. I hope with that remarkable century, some barmy critics do not question his ability again. I hope they do not ask him to retire again as they did a few times in the last couple of years. A man at 36 who reminded us of two of (Sharjah) innings he played more than a decade ago is surely unfit to retire. By taking India to victories in the CB finals in Australia last year, by scoring a flurry of 90s in 2007 and now, by showing the world that he does his best to make his team win, critics should focus only on the other players who need to be more responsible and dependable in times like these.

Critics will surely say that he has scored 45 tons but why has India won only 32 of those matches. Please realise that apart from him there are ten more players in the team who do not always score when they are supposed to and a few others give away too many runs which makes his half-centuries and centuries a part of records and not victories.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

The Failure of Champions League


When you think of Champions League, you think of football don't you? If someone says, 'the Champions League is a big failure', you'd call him foolish won't you? And if Champions League is such a big affair in football, why couldn't Lalit Modi & Co. think of a better name for the cricket version of it?

Whatever the name, it was indeed a failure. If you are a cricket fanatic, and were expecting something as good as, say, the Liverpool-AC Milan (3-3) final of 2005 or the Barcelona-Arsenal (2-1) final of 2006, then you were asking for too much.

Not much was gained from this league. T&T showed a lot of potential, and some guidance to the WI team, some stadia might have become marginally better and some ground workers might have become a little better off. But much more was lost than how much was gained. The most recent one being, Brett Lee being sent back home only the first ODI in the 7-match series in India. What were the chances of Lee not getting injured if there had been no CL? Surely, the chances would have been far less. Does Lee regret it? Even if he does, will he still play in every season of IPL and CL? Only time will tell...

Both IPL and CL were plagiarised brainchildren of Modi. With just one motive: EARN as MUCH as you can. The two seasons of IPL certainly earned him a few crores but not every league will turn out to be as successful in India. People in India are not that crazy about cricket that you'll get a full house for a match between two Aussie teams about whom Indian fans have never even heard! For me, it was a pleasure to see empty chairs and stands. It was a slap on Modi's face. I wanted CL to be a disaster. As a cricket fan I should have loved it, but don't we have enough cricket already? Isn't there an overload of cricket matches these days? Specially T20s? What would you prefer? Injury free Ashes, Champions Trophy or several leagues throughout the year and then match-winners like Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaks, Pietersen, Lee not able to represent their countries when they want to? The choice is yours..you will ultimately get what you want to see and not what you are made to see by millionaires just because they want to become billionaires.

The greed for money certainly attracts the players. From that point of view, I think it's fine till IPL because it gives a platform to tier II and III Indian players to play with players like Hayden, Gilchirst, Warne etc. and some money as well. But greed will kill the game. Numerous cricket lovers have already started disliking 50over matches. What will they do when they are bored of T20s? Hopefully, Tests will not get affected. I hope they are not. If the essence of the game dies, the game will not live long too.

I hope Modi gets picked up by aliens or gets raided by the income tax team so that we can get back to what we had before his dominance over Indian cricket and T20s. Or, I hope he thinks about the game for a change and not about his bank balance...